Jessica Giles
Executive Director, DC
Education Reform Now Advocacy
Committee of the Whole Public Hearing on:
- Bill 25-740, “Truancy Reduction for Student Success Act of 2024”
- Bill 25-754, “Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy Reduction Amendment Act of 2024”
- Bill 25-758, “The Showing Up for Students Amendment Act of 2024”
- Bill 25-791, “Utilizing Partnerships, Local Interventions for Truancy and Safety (UPLIFT) Amendment Act of 2024”
Chairman Mendelson, members, and staff of the Committee of the Whole,
My name is Jessica Giles. I am a ward seven resident and the Executive Director of the DC Chapter of Education Reform Now Advocacy, an organization fighting for a just and equitable public education system for all DC students. Thank you for holding a hearing on B25-740, B25-754, B25-758, and B25-791.
Across the nation, chronic absenteeism, or missing more than 10% of a school year, has risen sharply in the past few years. The crisis is especially acute in Washington, DC. Last school year, 43% of DC students were chronically absent and three out of five high school students were chronically absent.[1] 37 percent of DC students were truant meaning they accrued ten or more unexcused absences per year. Shockingly, several schools have chronic truancy rates at or above 80 percent.[2]
While both chronic absenteeism and truancy rates in DC fell slightly in the past year, trending in the right direction, nearly half of our students are still missing significant instructional time. And this is a problem. Chronic absenteeism is associated with missed early learning outcomes, increased rates of high school dropout, and poor outcomes later in life, from poverty and diminished health to involvement in the criminal justice system. In short, students need to attend school to learn and live productive lives.
So why are so many students chronically absent and truant? The causes are complex – issues such as safety, transportation, health, among other factors – affect student attendance. Indeed, the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE) found that excused absence totals in SY22-23 remained similar to the prior year.[3]
Any legislation that the Mayor and DC Council move forward must strengthen student absentee reporting, improve the referral process, and provide students and families with evidence-based interventions.
Improve reporting of student attendance
Student absentee data must be shared in a timely, accurate, and actionable manner. DC Council should require more frequent reporting of absenteeism and average daily attendance by school, at least once per month, which could help OSSE and local educational agency (LEA) leaders learn more quickly what is working or intervene timely to support schools with the greatest challenges. Additionally, DC Council should require LEAs to report to OSSE on the reasons for students’ absences (such as illness, funeral, court proceedings, religious observance, etc.).[4] This data would provide valuable insights into school and neighborhood trends to inform policymaking and the allocation of resources. This should come with citywide recognition for schools and agencies that make needed improvements to student attendance.
Strengthen the referral process
Prior hearings on chronic absenteeism and truancy have revealed that our referral system is broken. When LEAs refer students with significant attendance challenges to agencies, too often, students and families do not receive immediate and meaningful help. The DC Council must ensure that agencies charged with providing support to families have appropriate resources to do their work and are held accountable for providing services in a timely manner.
Additionally, the referral process must be updated. Investing in a single, streamlined technological tool that LEAs and city agencies share would allow for tracking agencies’ service delivery timelines and building a culture of improving support. Further, the DC Council must give agencies and LEAs enough time and resources to implement changes with fidelity.
Support students and families through evidence-based practices
Most importantly, our students and families need greater support. We should analyze what schools are doing to improve student attendance and replicate best practices. For example, the DC Policy Center’s recent analysis of chronic absenteeism changes between SY22-23 and SY23-24 – thanks to OSSE’s new mid-year attendance brief – showed that some schools, such as Smothers and Perry Street Prep, reduced chronic absenteeism significantly[5]. What’s their secret sauce? Additionally, the Mayor and DC Council should continue to invest in evidence-based practices, like home visiting[6] and nudge communications[7].
The bottom line is that no single solution can fix student attendance. It will take thoughtful legislation, sustained investments in evidence-based practices, strong oversight, and strategic support for students and families when needs arise. It will also take our entire community underscoring the value of consistent school attendance.
My written testimony provides some comments on each bill. I am available to answer any questions you may have.
Bill 25-740 – Truancy Reduction for Student Success Act of 2024
(Introduced by Councilmember Robert White)
The primary focus of this bill is to require OSSE to post student absentee data monthly, by school in the School Year 2025-26 (SY25-26). The current code requires OSSE to report absentee data annually, within 60 days after the school year ends[8], limiting the ability for the data to inform timely changes to practice. Other states, such as North Carolina, post attendance data monthly[9], enabling policymakers and practitioners to respond in real-time.
However, we suggest the DC Council go beyond reporting on absentee data by mandating OSSE report average daily attendance by school on a similar timeline so that the field can determine which schools are “bright spots” among attendance. For example, the DC Policy Center’s recent analysis of chronic absenteeism changes between SY22-23 and School Year 2023-24 (SY23-24) showed that some schools, such as Smothers and Perry Street Prep, reduced chronic absenteeism significantly.[10] While this year-over-year analysis was helpful, more frequent reporting could help state and LEA leaders learn more quickly what is working or intervene timely to support schools with the greatest challenges.
Additionally, we recommend that the Council mandate LEAs report to OSSE on the reasons for students’ absences (such as illness, funeral, court proceedings, religious observance, etc.). This data could provide valuable insights for city-wide policymaking and resource allocation.
Bill 25-754 – Chronic Absenteeism and Truancy Reduction Amendment Act of 2024
(Introduced by Councilmember Charles Allen)
- Schools with a chronic absenteeism rate of 20% and above are designated as priority areas for the Safe Passages Safe Blocks program by School Year 2027-2028. While expanding safe passage is needed, schools have high rates of chronic absenteeism for a variety of reasons that may be unrelated to safety. We support further expansion of the Safe Passages Safe Blocks program only when there is evidence of great public safety needs.
- A new funding category is added to school budgets specifically to address chronic absenteeism. We oppose this. DC has been challenged with chronic absenteeism and truancy for many years; any additional funding that LEAs receive should be given only if schools are adopting evidence-based practices.
- School principals are given the authority to choose how to use additional at-risk or chronically absent funding allocated to the school. We oppose the specific mandates regarding DC Public Schools in this bill. The bill proposes that DC Public Schools (DCPS) post at-risk plans and send them to DC Council by February 1. DCPS’ budget development timeline is driven by the executive’s budget process; DCPS should not be held accountable to a deadline outside its control. In addition, DCPS has documented its methodology for the use of UPSFF funds for students designated as “at-risk”[11]. Asking school principals to create these additional plans is burdensome and unnecessary.
- Schools are mandated to intervene after five or more unexcused absences in a marking period prior to a referral. We commend requiring this kind of sensible support, as many school campuses are already providing it.
- Requires the Department of Human Services (DHS) to report monthly to schools and the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) to provide annual reports. We support the bill’s aim of having DHS and OAG provide reports on its progress in supporting students and families.
Bill 25-758 – The Showing Up for Students Amendment Act of 2024
(Introduced by Councilmember Zachary Parker)
- Expands the set of valid excuses to include specific or presumed threats of violence, the serious illness of a family member, housing displacement, and absences relating to family and immigration court proceedings. We believe a valid excuse should include when OSSE fails to provide transportation, but we believe schools already have discretion regarding additional explanations they consider to be valid.
- Modifies the process for engagement with families of students who accrue unexcused absences. Overall, any changes to agency referrals should be streamlined, minimize the burden on LEAs, school campuses, and agencies, and come with sufficient resources. Namely, the bill shifts truancy referrals for 14-17-year-olds from schools to OSSE might have unintended consequences because schools have a relationship with the students and families that OSSE won’t have. Additionally, the bill requires that DHS staff conduct home visits for any student with more than 20 unexcused absences. DHS staff may not be the best choice to conduct home visits, as they lack existing relationships with many families and may not have support options suitable for all students. Instead, building on the successes of DCPS’ home visit program, which leverages trusted educators’ relationships to boost achievement[12], we recommend the DC Council instead allocate resources to LEAs or programs that do this work well.
- Tasks District education agencies to provide greater analysis, support, and interagency coordination to reduce absenteeism and truancy. Overall, we are supportive of the intent of these provisions but question whether this is duplicative of current efforts that the Deputy Mayor for Education is leading with Every Day Counts.
- Adjusts the District’s neglect and child supervision standards and defines the existing concept of educational neglect. Determining educational neglect is likely more of an art than a science, so we encourage the DC Council to establish a community-driven process to define it that strikes the right balance between providing families with support when challenges arise and holding them accountable for unaddressed truancy.
- Requires more detailed reporting and root cause deliberation. These provisions are worthwhile.
Bill 25-791 – Utilizing Partnerships and Local Interventions for Truancy and Safety (UPLIFT) Amendment Act of 2024
(Introduced by Mayor Muriel Bowser)
This bill modifies the referral process for unexcused absences by shifting the timing of the referral process as well as the referral agency from the CFSA to DHS for children 14-17 years of age with 15 unexcused absences and to OAG if they have 25 or more. Overall, any changes to agency referrals should be streamlined, minimize the burden on LEAs, school campuses, and agencies, and come with sufficient resources. We are curious about the extent to which DHS has the staff capacity to handle referrals effectively.
Regarding Title I-III, we are wary of punitive approaches that limit discretion in responding to youth and that expand the definition of a weapon. Further, Title IV of the bill allows for placement of youth in grades 6-12 in an alternative setting for 11-45 days. We would want to hear more about how such a program would effectively support students in staying on track academically and reintegrating into their home schools.
[1] Ibid
[2] https://osse.dc.gov/publication/dc-attendance-report-2022-23-school-year
[3] Ibid.
[4] https://osse.dc.gov/page/attendance-and-truancy-resources-schools and https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/38-203#:~:text=(e)%20Any%20person%20convicted%20of,or%20both%20for%20each%20offense
[5] https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/chart-of-the-week-schools-on-track-to-improve-chronic-absenteeism/
[6] https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/projects/project.asp?projectID=4597&display=1
[7] https://dme.dc.gov/node/1660471
[8] https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/sections/38-203
[9]https://www.dpi.nc.gov/districts-schools/district-operations/financial-and-business-services/demographics-and-finances/student-accounting-data#PrincipalsMonthlyReportPMR-955
[10] https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/chart-of-the-week-schools-on-track-to-improve-chronic-absenteeism/
[11] https://dcpsbudget.com/budget-model/at-risk-funding/
[12] https://flamboyanfoundation.org/resource/jhu-evaluation-of-the-family-engagement-partnership/